NBA’s Proposal To Abolish Death Penalty Sparks Diverse Public Reactions

Earlier this month, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) renewed its call for the abolition of the death penalty, arguing that it violates the right to life and often highlights failures in the justice system that fail to protect the vulnerable…..CONTINUE READING 

NBA President Afam Osigwe made these points during a high-level consultation organized by the National Human Rights Commission, Avocats Sans Frontières France, and the Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP) in recognition of World Day Against the Death Penalty on October 10. He emphasized that the day serves as a reminder to reflect on the death penalty from legal, moral, ethical, and human rights perspectives.

Osigwe cited Nelson Mandela, stating that denying people their rights undermines their humanity. He argued that the death penalty not only takes away life but also reflects systemic injustices within the justice system. He pointed out that over 140 countries have abolished or placed moratoriums on the death penalty, signaling a global consensus on the value of human life and the need for justice systems that embody humanity and dignity.

He highlighted the United Nations General Assembly’s resolutions urging member states to consider moratoriums leading to abolition, noting that the right to life is foundational to all human rights and should not be taken lightly.

Despite the legal status of the death penalty in Nigeria for crimes such as armed robbery, terrorism, and murder, Osigwe raised concerns about wrongful convictions that could lead to executing innocent individuals. He stressed that the death penalty might not only be ineffective as a deterrent but could also exacerbate systemic issues within the justice system, particularly affecting marginalized communities.

In contrast, some Nigerians oppose the NBA’s stance. Critics argue that abolishing the death penalty could lead to an increase in violent crimes, as they believe it serves as a deterrent. Public affairs analyst Emmanuel Aziken asserted that the Bible supports capital punishment for malicious killings, emphasizing the need for thorough investigations to ensure justice.

Similarly, journalist Nze Ezeocha maintained that the death penalty deters potential offenders, calling for competent judges to avoid wrongful convictions. He also suggested that state governors should expedite the signing of death warrants to address prison overcrowding.

Alhaji Yerima Shettima, president of the Arewa Youth Consultative Forum, argued that abolishing the death penalty would undermine law enforcement, leading to greater lawlessness. He advocated for reinforcing the death penalty, even proposing it for severe corruption offenses, similar to laws in some Asian countries.

Proponents of abolition, including lawyer Ikechukwu Onodi, argue that the death penalty has not effectively deterred crime in Nigeria and advocate for an alternative justice system. Onodi criticized the outdated nature of capital punishment, pointing out that no executions have occurred in recent times due to governors’ reluctance to sign death warrants, resulting in psychological distress for those on death row.

In conclusion, the debate over the death penalty in Nigeria remains polarized, with strong arguments on both sides regarding its effectiveness, moral implications, and the need for reform in the justice system.