Federal High Court Gives New Directive On Pre-Election Disputes

According to Ireporter Online, the directives were issued on Tuesday by the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, who acted under powers derived from relevant provisions of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) as well as the Electoral Act, 2026. The new framework officially repeals the 2022 Practice Directions and introduces updated procedures aimed at strengthening efficiency in election-related litigation.

The court explained that the revised guidelines are designed to ensure that parties focus strictly on issues in contention, reduce delays caused by interlocutory applications, encourage amicable settlement where possible, and curb unnecessary adjournments in the adjudication process. It further noted that the reforms align with constitutional provisions and the Electoral Act, 2026, as well as other applicable laws.

Under the new directions, all pre-election matters must be filed as originating summons in line with prescribed court forms, while cases involving allegations of fraud, forgery, or highly contentious facts may require oral evidence and the calling of witnesses. The rules also mandate that all relevant parties be joined in suits challenging primary election outcomes to ensure effective determination of disputes.

Given the time-sensitive nature of pre-election cases, the court has directed that registries across all judicial divisions remain open on weekends and public holidays between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. solely for filing such matters. It also emphasized the use of electronic communication to notify counsel of urgent proceedings, as well as the adoption of virtual hearings where necessary.

Furthermore, the Practice Directions stipulate that once parties complete the exchange of processes, courts must schedule hearings within seven days. Judges are required to prioritise such matters until judgment is delivered, while limiting adjournments to a maximum of two per party in order to prevent delay tactics.

The Federal High Court reiterated that these measures are intended to ensure swift dispensation of justice, improve electoral dispute resolution, and enhance overall judicial efficiency ahead of the 2027 general elections.