Connect with us

Latest News

BREAKING: Court Takes Strong Action In Suit Challenging Tinubu’s Candidacy

Published

on

Bola Tinubu 1424x802 1

BREAKING: Court Takes Strong Action In Suit Challenging Tinubu’s Candidacy

Bola Tinubu 1424x802 1

The Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a case challenging the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential candidate, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, ahead of the 2023 elections.

Bayo Onanuga, the APC Presidential Campaign Council’s Director of Media and Publicity, confirmed the dismissal in a statement.

It was noted that in recent weeks, the courts had dismissed several cases brought against Tinubu by opposition elements, including Action Alliance, as frivolous, without merit, and an abuse of court processes.

Advertisement

In the case with suit no FHC/ABJ/CS/854/2022, Justice Fadima Aminu Muritala referred to the plaintiff, Elder Ngozika Ihuoma, as a “meddling interloper with no locus standi to institute the suit.”

The most recent case is the fourth to be dismissed by the courts in recent weeks.

After APC’s counsel, Julius Ishola Esq from Babatunde Ogala & Co urged the Court to dismiss the case with heavy costs for wasting judicial time, Justice Muritala dismissed it as speculative.

Read Also Tinubu Finally Opens Up On His Source Of Wealth, Reveals If He Shares From Lagos Resources

Advertisement

Ihuoma filed a lawsuit against Tinubu and five others on June 9, 2022, after Tinubu won the APC presidential primary election.

He sought six reliefs, including an injunction barring Tinubu from running in the 2023 presidential election.

In response to the suit, the law firm of Babatunde Ogala (SAN) & Co filed a counter affidavit in opposition to the Originating Summons and a Notice of Preliminary Objection on behalf of the All Progressives Congress.

The counter-affidavit called Ihuoma’s locus standi and grounds for the action into question.

Advertisement

It asked the court to rule that the case was speculative, pre-emptive, and non-justiciable because it involved the internal affairs of a political party.

The counter-affidavit also criticized Ihuoma’s case as academic, theoretical, and an abuse of the legal system.

On Monday, the court upheld the defense counsel’s objections and dismissed the case.

Never Miss Any News, Join Our WhatsApp Group With This Link Below

Advertisement

https://chat.whatsapp.com/DdBOorlQD6wE9BhmOAon3c

Advertisement
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x