Edo 2024: The Unfounded Claims Of Imasuagbon – A Divisive Attempt At Manipulation Of Akpata’s Victory 

Edo 2024: The Unfounded Claims Of Imasuagbon – A Divisive Attempt At Manipulation Of Akpata’s Victory

By Oshiobugie John

In the aftermath of the Labour Party’s primary for the Edo 2024 gubernatorial elections, Kenneth Imansuangbon, a defeated aspirant, has resorted to baseless claims and threats, exposing his bitterness at losing the ticket. His attempt to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the process reeks of deceit and a desperate bid to manipulate the situation in his favor.

Imansuangbon’s assertion that the ward congresses were corrupted by irregularities lacks substance and appears to be a mere excuse for his defeat. Accusing the party leadership, including National Chairman Julius Abure and State Chairman Kelly Ogbaloi, of favoring Olumide Osaigbovo Akpata is a thinly veiled attempt to deflect responsibility for his failure.

The threat to drag the Labour Party to court if he is not declared the candidate within a week is not only premature but also smacks of a disregard for due process. It is essential to recognize that the legitimacy of the electoral process should be determined through established party procedures and not through ultimatums and legal threats.

Imansuangbon’s misplaced praise for the APC and PDP, solely based on their candidates’ origin from Edo Central Senatorial District, is a blatant attempt to play the ethnic card. Such divisive tactics have no place in a democratic society and only serve to undermine the principles of unity and inclusiveness.

Leaders within the Labour Party have countered Imansuangbon’s accusations, revealing that he had attempted to compromise those he now blames for his failure. This paints a picture of a candidate willing to sacrifice principles and integrity for personal gain, further diminishing the credibility of his claims.

In contrast, Olumide Osaigbovo Akpata’s victory in the party primary is a result of a free and fair process, untainted by the baseless allegations put forth by Imansuangbon. The widespread support for Akpata is evident in the genuine enthusiasm from the electorate and the acknowledgment of his grassroots efforts.

In conclusion, Imansuangbon’s divisive tactics, false claims, and threats not only reveal his bitterness but also underscore his unsuitability for public office. Edo deserves a leader who embraces the principles of democracy, unity, and fairness. The candidacy of Akpata, who emerged victorious on a transparent and credible platform, represents a beacon of hope for the state, and the electorate should wholeheartedly rally behind him for a progressive and inclusive future.

Oshiobugie John Omo-Ikirodah writes in for Bush Radio Academy.